I am currently supporting an initiative which requires multiple Application Groups to migrate from various defect management tools to a standardized Quality Center/ALM template. Some of these groups track enhancements in the Defect module, because the lifecycle stages are quite similar to that of defects. Can you provide your suggestions/inputs on the optimal way to track these items, should it be in the Defects Module or the Requirements Module in QC/ALM? The goal was to use the Requirements Module to track Enhancements, so that Application Functionality is tracked in a single repository, but since this will impact a lot of teams, would like to get inputs from this community. From a workflow perspective, does the Defect Module provide any additional benefits which are not supported by the Requirements Module?